Model of Perception
Perception -- process of receiving information from environment and
making sense of it (organizing and interpreting
Model of Perception
1. Environmental stimuli are received through senses
2. Received stimuli selected in or screened out
3. Selected stimuli are organized and interpreted
4. Interpreted information becomes beliefs, which influences behavior
|
Selective Attention
Process of filtering information through senses -- impossible to attend
to all stimuli reaching our senses
Three influences on selective attention
1. Characteristics of the object
-- large size
-- brightly colored (intensity)
-- in motion
-- repetitive
-- unique (novelty)
|
2. Perceptual context
-- objects/people stand out against the environment
3. Characteristics of the perceiver
-- recognize and remember information consistent with our values
and attitudes
-- perceptual defense -- emotions screen out large blocks of
information that threaten self-esteem
-- expectations -- condition us to expect events
Splatter vision -- scanning everything and focusing on nothing
Taking everything in as a whole; focus on nothing
-- expect the unexpected; check your peripheral vision
Used by fighter pilots, bird watchers, and security
Need to avoid over-reliance on familiar expectations
Minimizes selective attention process -- reduces chance of screening
out potentially important information
Perceptual Organization & Interpretation
Perceptual grouping principles
Identifying trends
Similarity or proximity
Closure -- filling in missing pieces (e.g. assuming who attended
meeting while you were away)
Perceptual grouping helps us make sense of the workplace, but it may
inhibit creativity
Mental models
Broad world-views or theories-in-use
-- create screen through which we select information
-- mental boxes used to store information
-- assumptions used to interpret events
But can blind people to potentially better perspectives
|
Another example of how mental models have caused people to misinterpret
opportunities:
Ross Perot's retort when colleagues suggested in 1980 that EDS buy
an upstart company named Microsoft: What do 13 people in Seattle know that
we don't know?
|
Social Identity Theory
Explains self-perception and social perception in terms of:
1. Our personal identity
Unique characteristics (only person in class who
)
2. Our social identity
Membership in social groups
People adopt degrees of personal and social identity depending on the
situation
We identify ourselves with several groups and are motivated to
create and present a positive self-image
Perceiving Others Through Social Identity
Comparative process compare characteristics of our groups with
other groups
Homogenizing process --we perceive that everyone in a group has
similar characteristics
Contrasting process -- we often distinguish our social identity
groups with others by forming less positive images of others
|
Errors in the Perceptual Process
Stereotyping, attribution, self-fulfilling prophecy, and other
perceptual errors distort reality
Stereotyping
Based on social identity theory perceptual process
a. develop social categories and assign traits (e.g. professors are
absent-minded)
b. assign individual to social category based on identifiable features
(e.g. that person is a professor)
c. assign groups non-observable traits to individual (e.g. that person
is absent-minded)
|
How Accurate are Stereotypes?
Stereotypes have some inaccuracies, some overestimation or
underestimation, and some accuracy
Stereotyped traits do not accurately describe every person in that
social category
We often ignore or misinterpret information that is inconsistent
with the stereotype
Stereotypes less accurate when:
1. We seldom interact with people in that group
2. We experience conflict with members of that group
3. Stereotyping enhances our own social identity
We rely less on stereotypes as we get to know people better from
personal experience
Ethical Problems of Stereotyping
Prejudice -- unfounded negative emotions toward people belonging to
a particular stereotyped group
-- limits employment for qualified people
Even if prejudices suppressed, subtle discrimination occurs because
stereotypes influence "ideal" person
Stereotyping contributes to sexual harassment
-- Harassers tend to stereotype the (female) victim as subservient
or powerless
|
Attribution Theory
Internal attribution -- behavior or results are due mainly to
ability/motivation
External attribution -- behavior or results are due mainly to factors
beyond persons control (e.g. luck, availability of resources
Internal attribution made when:
High consistency -- person behaved this way before
Low distinctiveness -- person behaves like this toward other people
or in different situations
Low consensus -- other people do not behave this way in similar
situations
|
External attribution made when:
Low consistency -- person didnt behaved this way before
High distinctiveness -- person behaves like this toward other people
or in different situations
High consensus -- other people behave this way in similar situations
Implications of attributions
Affects decisions -- grievances, reward distribution
Employee self-efficacy -- feeling of accomplishment only if we make
an internal attribution
Attribution Errors
Fundamental attribution error
-- attributing behavior of other people to internal factors (their
motivation/ability) than external factors
-- most common when we have limited information about the
situational factors affecting other people
Self-serving bias
-- attributing our successes to internal factors; our failures to
external factors
-- ego-defense mechanism
|
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Expectations about another person cause that person to act in a way that
is consistent with those expectations
1. Expectations formed
e.g. Supervisor develops expectations about employee's future
behavior
2. Expectations affect behavior toward employee
high expectancy employees receive:
- more emotional support through nonverbal cues (e.g. more
smiling and eye contact);
- more frequent/valuable feedback/reinforcement;
- more challenging goals and better training;
- more opportunities to demonstrate their performance.
3. Effects on employee
better training/practice result in more skills learned
emotional support and feedback results in stronger self-efficacy --
leads to higher motivation
|
4. Employee behavior and performance
Better motivation/skills leads to high performance
High performance reinforces the original perception
Awareness training was early strategy to minimize negative
self-fulfilling prophecy
Problem limited effect because leaders have difficulty maintaining
positive expectations of people who dont perform well
Emerging three-prong strategy to harness self-fulfilling prophecy effect
1. Learning orientation leaders need to appreciate employee learning,
not just accomplishing tasks
2. Appropriate leadership style leaders adjust their style to
different employees
3. Increase employee self-efficacy behavioral modeling, opportunities
to practice successfully
|
Other Perceptual Errors
Primacy effect
Quickly categorizing people based on first impressions
Fulfills need to make sense of our world
Inaccurate perceptions due to limited information
Recency effect
Most recent info dominates perception of others
Occurs when time has worn off first impressions
Known problem -- recent information dominates performance appraisal
rating
Halo effect
One trait forms a general impression
Becomes the basis for judgments about other traits
Often occurs to fill in missing information and when the perceiver
is not motivated to observe
Problem in performance appraisals -- positive halo employee rated
high on all dimensions
Projection
Believing others have same characteristics as us
Defense mechanism to protect our self-esteem
|
Improving Perceptions
To minimize racial slurs and other perceptual problems, the NHL requires
every player to attend diversity awareness sessions. In these sessions,
players learn to appreciate ethnic differences and the problems with
prejudicial outbursts.
1. Diversity initiatives
a Recruit people with diverse backgrounds
-- outreach to minority-dominated schools
-- build long-term relationships with minorities
b. Provide reasonable accommodation
-- accommodate work-family balance
-- support nontraditional breaks for religious reasons
c. Diversity awareness activities
-- appreciation of differences in the workplace
-- sensitize people about stereotypes and prejudices
-- dispel myths about people from different backgrounds
-- doesnt try to correct deep-rooted prejudice
Beyond diversity awareness -- interact more with people with
different backgrounds
2. Empathize with others
A persons ability to understand the feelings, thoughts, and
situation of others
Minimizes attribution errors -- see external causes
Developing empathy skills
-- receive feedback on our interaction with others
-- work with others in their environment
|
3. Postpone impression
formation
Avoid first impressions
Constantly challenge our stereotypic expectations
Actively seek out contrary information
4. Compare perceptions with others
Get different points of view
|
5. Know Yourself (Johari Window)
Developed by Joseph Luft and Harry Ingram (hence the name "Johari")
Need to be aware of and sensitive to our own values, beliefs, and
prejudices
Better mutual understanding when others know us better
Helps us understand coworkers, etc.
a. open area -- information about you which is known to you as
well as others
b. blind area -- information that is known to others but not to
yourself
c. hidden area -- information known to yourself but unknown to
others
d. unknown area -- information about you known to neither you nor
others
Objective is to increase size of open area:
a. disclosure -- tell others about yourself
b. feedback -- receive information from others about yourself
found in the blind area
Applying the Johari Window
a. Diversity awareness -- interacting with others
b. 360-degree feedback process
c. Dialogue -- sharing perceptions
Cultural and ethical limitations of applying Johari Window
|
Personality
Relatively stable pattern of behaviors and consistent internal states
that explain a person's behavioral tendencies
Internal states -- thoughts, values, and genetic characteristics
inferred from behaviors
External traits -- person's social reputation, observable behaviors
Stable -- do not change dramatically over time
Behavioral tendencies -- less apparent where environment constrains
behavior
Personality shaped by both heredity and environment -- affected by
social experiences
|
Personality and Organizational Behavior
1960s-- evidence of very weak relationship between personality and
job performance
Personality now regained some credibility
-- certain personality traits predict certain work-related
behaviors, stress reactions, and emotions
-- personality related to job preferences
Personality tests should only supplement other selection methods
Big Five Personality Dimensions -- five clusters represent most
personality traits
1. Conscientiousness characterizes people who are caring, dependable
and self-disciplined.
-- predicts job performance in almost every job group
-- engage in more organizational citizenship behaviors
2. Emotional stability people who are poised, secure, calm and
enthusiastic.
3. Openness to experience refers to the extent to which people are
sensitive, flexible, creative and intellectual.
4. Agreeableness includes traits of being courteous, good-natured,
trusting, cooperative, empathic and caring.
5. Extroversion - characterizes people who are outgoing, talkative,
sociable and assertive
Conscientiousness one of the most valuable personality dimensions
Set higher personal goals for themselves
Higher levels of organizational citizenship
More adaptive to empowerment
Tend to provide better customer service (along with agreeableness
and emotional stability)
Jungs Psychological Types
Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung
Personality theory identifies preferences for perceiving the
environment and obtaining/processing information.
|
Other Personality Traits
Locus of control
Internal locus of control -- individuals who believe that they are
very much in charge of their own destiny
External locus of control -- individuals who believe that their life
events are due mainly to fate or luck
People with a moderately internal locus of control:
- perform better, have more successful careers, more job
satisfaction, better leaders
Self-monitoring
Level of sensitivity to situational cues, and ability to adapt their
behavior to that situation
High self-monitors: (a) better conversationalists, (b) better
leaders, (c) better boundary spanners
|